Steven Toth wrote: > Manu Abraham wrote: >> Steven Toth wrote: >> >>> Manu Abraham wrote: >>> >>>> Steven Toth wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> simpler/smaller interface. I made reference to this in my first >>>>> HVR4000 >>>>> patches where massive amounts of code were potentially being >>>>> duplicated. >>>>> >>>> Please point out the duplication. >>>> >>>> >>> At the time, the demod drivers had to provide a set_frontend() and >>> set_params() ops method. That meant two entry points into every driver >>> (with differing args), the same was true for many other entry points >>> that took the new structures. >>> >> >> Btw, before you start complaining about other's code, It is always >> better to have a look at your own code to have a feel where you are >> standing. >> >> Because of some of your changes we have had long arguments by Markus, >> (on locking) well this was in kernel. What you are complaining is >> something not even applied to the kernel and very much pre alpha. >> >> Just to talk back on the same tongue. >> >> > > You asked for my feedback. So, I gave you all the feedback based on > the last time I reviewed your code, I even said that these issue may > already be fixed. (Explicitly opening myself up for attack - should > you chose). This review took place prior to you removing it from > LinuxTV and you doing your own thing. > > Why are we arguing Manu when we both want the same thing to happen, > for multiproto to get traction? > > Have I not always been polite in all of my offers of help, prior to my > recent bitterness and/or sarcasm? > > Look at the situation from an outsiders perspective. Whenever the > subject of finishing the multiproto work comes up, the conversation > never ends in a happy place. > > I keep repeating myself when I'm say this: Nothing would make me > happier than seeing multiproto in a test tree, where people inside > (and outside) of the LinuxTV team can contribute. It would be a > significant step forward but whenever this subject is raised, > regardless of how politely I try to ask, it never results in a good > conversation. > > I wish we could find a better way to communicate (and/or work > together), for the good of everyone. > > - Steve > > > Resend. _______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
