Re: Hybrid tuner proposal (V4L/DVB)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> [big snip]
> 
> C'mon guys, let's leave the past behind us and
> not start fighting again.
> 
> I believe many people ("users") would like em28xx to be merged
> asap, so I'm trying to find a way how it could be done.
> 
> It is unfortunate that em28xx depends on the hybrid tuner
> API design, but we have to live with it.
> 
>> On 4/10/07, Manu Abraham <abraham.manu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-video&m=117571761928085&w=2
>>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-video&m=117613833119350&w=2
> 
> If that proposal is _proven to work_ ("dummy_hybrid_tuner.c" doesn't
> sound like it's been tested), _and_ has more supporters than
> Markus' code, then I would ask him to rebase his code
> on top of it. However, I don't think we should wait
> another month for your proposal to be ready.
> 


dummy hybrid tuner was just an extension to the multiproto update, which
is already being used by the stb0899 and the hvr4000. So there isn't too
much to test in there

Manu


_______________________________________________
linux-dvb mailing list
linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Asterisk]     [Samba]     [Xorg]     [Xfree86]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux