Thanks for your reply Michael.
> Does anyone have the Dual Digital 2 > working properly in a similar situation? I'm sure there's no real > difference between the two. On the contrary, the FusionHDTV Dual Digital 4 is *very* different from the FusionHDTV Dual Digital 2.
Gak! Maybe I should return it, and hunt for old stock of the Dual Digital 2. Is there any reason (features or otherwise) why I should keep the Dual Digital 4?
The FusionHDTV Dual Digital 2 uses a Samsung tuner, Dnos104z, while the FusionHDTV Dual Digital 4 uses the Xceive xc3028 silicon tuner. XC3028 is not supported in the v4l-dvb master branch at this time, nor is it supported in any upstream kernel.
Aw damn.
The tuner wrapper module is not yet complete, although it does work. I still have to work out some kinks in it. As you can tell from my description above, I am already working on adding support for the FusionHDTV Dual Digital 4. I have access to a machine in Australia with this card, and I already have it working, except for the tuner issue. I haven't had any time in the past two weeks to work on it, but I do have some time off from my day job coming up soon.
If there's anything I can do to help (as a former C programmer, but no kernel experience), let me know. Access to hardware, etc. Cheers and thanks, Simon _______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
