Hi,
On Sun, 30 Jul 2006, matthieu castet wrote:
> Klaus Frahm wrote:
>
> Patrick, I look at the driver and saw that some AGC setting specific to tuner
> are different :
> old driver do :
> static const struct dib3000p_agc_config dib3000p_agc_microtune_mt2060 = {
> - { 0x196, 0x301d, 0x0, 0x1cc7, 0xffff, 0x5c29,
> - 0xa8f6, 0x5eb8, 0x65ff, 0x40ff, 0x8a, 0x1114 }
> -};
>
> /* AGC setting - specific to the tuners */
> wr(36, agc->val[0]);
> wr(37, agc->val[1]);
> wr(38, agc->val[2]);
> wr(39, agc->val[3]);
>
> wr(42, agc->val[4]);
> wr(43, agc->val[5]);
> wr(44, agc->val[6]);
> wr(45, agc->val[7]);
> wr(46, agc->val[8]);
> wr(47, agc->val[9]);
> wr(48, agc->val[10]);
> wr(49, agc->val[11]);
>
> new one do :
> +static struct dibx000_agc_config dib3000p_mt2060_agc_config = {
> + .band_caps = BAND_VHF | BAND_UHF,
> + .setup = (0 << 15) | (0 << 14) | (1 << 13) | (1 << 12) | (29 << 0),
> +
> + .agc1_max = 48497, //was 65535
> + .agc1_min = 23593,
> + .agc2_max = 46531, //was 43254
> + .agc2_min = 24904, //was 24248
> +
> + .agc1_pt1 = 0x65,
> + .agc1_pt2 = 0x69, //was 0xff
> +
> + .agc1_slope1 = 0x51, //was 0x40
> + .agc1_slope2 = 0x27, //was 0xff
> +
> + .agc2_pt1 = 0,
> + .agc2_pt2 = 0x33, //was 0x8a
> +
> + .agc2_slope1 = 0x35, //was 0x11
> + .agc2_slope2 = 0x37, //was 0x14
> +};
>
> static struct dib3000mc_config stk3000p_dib3000p_config = {
> + &dib3000p_mt2060_agc_config,
> +
> + .max_time = 0x196,
> + .ln_adc_level = 0x1cc7,
> +
> + .output_mpeg2_in_188_bytes = 1,
> +};
>
> /* agc */
> + dib3000mc_write_word(state, 36, state->cfg->max_time);
> + dib3000mc_write_word(state, 37, agc->setup);
> + dib3000mc_write_word(state, 38, state->cfg->pwm3_value);
> + dib3000mc_write_word(state, 39, state->cfg->ln_adc_level);
> +
> +
> + dib3000mc_write_word(state, 42, agc->agc1_max);
> + dib3000mc_write_word(state, 43, agc->agc1_min);
> + dib3000mc_write_word(state, 44, agc->agc2_max);
> + dib3000mc_write_word(state, 45, agc->agc2_min);
> + dib3000mc_write_word(state, 46, (agc->agc1_pt1 << 8) | agc->agc1_pt2);
> + dib3000mc_write_word(state, 47, (agc->agc1_slope1 << 8) | agc->agc1_slope2);
> + dib3000mc_write_word(state, 48, (agc->agc2_pt1 << 8) | agc->agc2_pt2);
> + dib3000mc_write_word(state, 49, (agc->agc2_slope1 << 8) | agc->agc2_slope2);
>
> Do you any infos why this changes where made ?
Might be a mistake: Do you say that when you convert the data from the old
buffer to the new agc-structure it works better? Otherwise I don't see why
it changed.
regards,
Patrick.
--
Mail: patrick.boettcher@xxxxxxx
WWW: http://www.wi-bw.tfh-wildau.de/~pboettch/
_______________________________________________
linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
