On Mon, May 22, 2006, Andrew de Quincey wrote: > > > I also say it again: I am deeply dissatisfied that none > > of the people you mentioned at the bottom of > > http://linuxtv.org/pipermail/linux-dvb/2006-May/010076.html > > seem to care enough to participate in the discussion. > > (Not to mention that app developers also don't > > seem to care -- after all these are the ones who'll have > > to deal with the new API.) > > We _are_ participating in the discussion on IRC - MA is posting to the mailing > list as well so those not using IRC can take part as well. > > MA is doing this because he is one of the main developers behind the STB0899 > demod and therefore the S2 API. I don't see how he can hope to suppport S2 > without changing the API in some way. > > As far as I am concerned, I'm quite happy with how the new API is evolving. > > There are likely some rough edges still, but those will be fixed during the > implementation of the S2 driver since it will be the first to actually _use_ > the API. It isn't visible to me and to many others what happens on irc. Using irc is fine, but I'd like there to be a comprehensible exchange of arguments on the mailing list. What I saw was that part of my comments were ignored, but OTOH there was a steady trickle of changes without sufficient reasoning. Johannes _______________________________________________ linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
