On Sat, May 13, 2006, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Em Sáb, 2006-05-13 às 02:18 +0200, Johannes Stezenbach escreveu: > > On Sat, May 13, 2006, Andrew de Quincey wrote: > > > On Saturday 13 May 2006 00:27, Trent Piepho wrote: > > > > Here are patches for four different kernel compat issues, plus a patch to > > > > update versions.txt. > > > > > > All these look good to me - if no one else complains I'll apply 'em. > > > > > > Does anyone have any objections to Trent's other mutex/sempahore compat patch > > > at: > > > http://www.linuxtv.org/pipermail/linux-dvb/2006-April/009510.html > > > > > > If not, I'll apply that too.... > > > > Please wait for Mauro to ACK, they touch a lot of v4l > > code, and I'm not sure if Mauro's scripts handle the > > removal of the new compat stuff when creating patches > > for sending to Linus. > > For my scripts, this won't hurt. The filtering stuff is done by > v4l/scripts/gentree.pl inside the tree. > > The basic question here is: All V4L and DVB developers comfortable with > this? If so, we can proceed and apply it. Otherwise, please manifest > within the next 3 days. Did you also look at the bunch of patches at the start of the thread? http://linuxtv.org/pipermail/linux-dvb/2006-May/010195.html They have stuff like: diff -r e9383e768f51 -r 40ba20975e81 linux/drivers/media/video/usbvideo/konicawc.c --- a/linux/drivers/media/video/usbvideo/konicawc.c Fri May 12 15:26:41 2006 -0700 +++ b/linux/drivers/media/video/usbvideo/konicawc.c Fri May 12 15:40:23 2006 -0700 @@ -16,7 +16,11 @@ #include <linux/module.h> #include <linux/init.h> #include <linux/input.h> +#define V4LCOMPAT_USB_INPUT /* Include usb_input code in compat.h */ +#include "compat.h" +#if !defined(V4LCOMPAT_NO_USB_INPUT) #include <linux/usb_input.h> +#endif I think the mutex patch is large but fairly uncontroversial, but for this stuff I don't know... Johannes _______________________________________________ linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
