On 12/16/05, mrwester <mrwester@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Thanks for the reply... I'm not trying to challenge the idea, just to be > educated by the folks on the list who are obviously much more knowledgable > than myself regarding these topics. Should there be a difference between > the PVR-350 and the PVR-500 PCI bandwidth? I can capture with both tuners > of the PVR-500 at the same time as the FusionHDTV 5 lite and nothing is > corrupt. Recording with the single tuner of the PVR-350 at the same time as > the FusionHDTV 5 lite gives corrupt recordings... Other data points, from a > similar post to the mythtv list suggested that one person was able to > capture 4 HDTV streams concurrently with no corruption... Any insight you > can provide is welcome. Thanks, Mr Wester- Sorry I never replied to you... I just noticed that I had a draft email halfway written to you, saved on december 16th 2005 ! ..... maybe you forgot all about me by now. Anyway, looking back at this thread, it is obvious that my statement above is incorrect, and I have in fact proven it wrong.... I have a pvr350 in my machine along with a bunch of other v4l and dvb cards. So, I have completely no idea why this wouldnt work for you. Have you since fixed it yet? (it has been over four months :-P ) If not, maybe it could be some sort of motherboard quirk? -Mike _______________________________________________ linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
