On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 Ralph Scharpf wrote: > First I though the 261f firmware is better. But in the meanwhile I am about to > say it is just the same as 261d. What I can say is that 261d was not better > than 261f. > > Have you an idea what is the problem (any details)? Unfortunately, no. Half of the firmware is binary-only cruft, and the documentation for it is incomplete and misleading. Not much fun to hunt bugs under these circumstances. > Can I help you in any way? You already did by testing and reporting your results. There not much else you can do. Thanks, Johannes
