Manu Abraham wrote: > Johannes Stezenbach wrote: > >> Michael Krufky wrote: >> >>> Graeme Christie wrote: >>> >>> >>>> It seems to me as if this bug has resurfaced again. I had no >>>> problems loading bttv with my twinhan VP1030A with the 2.6.12 kernel >>>> (actually patched for gentoo-sources, but I don't think there were >>>> any bttv related patches). When trying to upgrade to either >>>> 2.6.13-rc3 or 2.6.13-rc3-mm1 I was getting a hang when loading bttv, >>>> both from the kernel vedeo4linux tree and from the latest cvs >>>> (18/7/2005). I applied the patch Manu posted months ago from >>>> http://www.linuxtv.org/pipermail/linux-dvb/attachments/20050404/00967085/bttv-cards.c-0001.bin >>>> to the video4linux cvs source compiled againt 2.6.13-rc3-mm1 and the >>>> problem was fixed. >>>> >>>> Just thought that anyone else crawling this list for fixed might >>>> want to know. Did the fix not make it into the video4linux cvs tree >>>> ? (the patch applied cleanly) >>> >>> >>> I am one of the "cvs maintainers" of the video4linux tree... The >>> official maintainer is on vacation right now. Is this an analog >>> board or a DVB board? Can you send the link to the original email? >>> The file linked to above is showing up as a binary file and I don't >>> know what to do with it. >>> >>> If the patch that you speak of is indeed a patch to the video4linux >>> tree, and it prevents a hang in the bttv driver, then sure, it should >>> be applied. Please send that patch into the video4linux list >>> <video4linux-list@xxxxxxxxxx> and then it can be applied to cvs, and >>> if it actually fixes a bug and doesnt break anything else, then we >>> can even apply it to 2.6.13 before it gets released. >> >> >> >> There is a better patch. It probably got lost because it was >> applied to the kernel which v4l was maintainer- and CVS-less. > > > Any idea whether the i2c timing patch also got lost ? > It seems only the bttv_reset_audio bugfix only got lost. But that went mainline too, IIRC, maybe never got back to v4l CVS .. Manu
