Hey Manu,
you got it wrong, sorry I was unclear, obviously. (Is it my English?)
I asked:
>> What about me? I would like to do something, too. Especially in libdvbsi.
^^^^^^^^^
and I meant it as an offer to help extending your approach, not to get my
idea back (in fact I completely dropped it and just using it for private
things, now).
E.g.: I assume libdvbsi will be used for scanning for channels.
As I have some spare time at the moment I just wanted to help you to not
do all the work alone. That's why I ask additionally:
>> Which tasks are open (I know you are already ahead of that what can be
>> found in CVS)? Can you please sync it with you local source-tree?
and
>> As you know I already put some thoughts into that area, too, maybe I can be
>> of any help ;)? (Maybe some #define's for ease up code reading (get_bits as
^^^
I explicitly asked you for assigning me a task, nothing more, nothing
less. When you would say, please wait, don't do anything because at the
current state you cannot help in any way, I will accept, but you didn't
say that, did you?
I know sometimes it's better to do things on one's own, but especially the
grunt work of adding table/descriptor parser-code can be shared, or not?
E.g. ATSC tables. I have access to ATSC-signals, so I could write and test
ATSC-parser code in your libdvbsi in your way.
I hope I described my situation now understandable for you and hope you
get back to me with instructions.
--
*sigh* I just read your answer again (which is not quoted below anymore)
and I think it was a little unfair in that context. I won't have the heart
to contribute to your approaches in the future, because I will be afraid
of you getting it wrong. Please take that shame off of me.
a sad Patrick.
--
Mail: patrick.boettcher@xxxxxxx
WWW: http://www.wi-bw.tfh-wildau.de/~pboettch/
