Dominique Dumont wrote: > Manu Abraham <manu@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > >>The main reason why i avoided this library, inspite i was using it, >>was the suggestion by others that a bloat like that should not end up >>in the CVS. > > > Mpsys source code is 5645 lines (ok I had to fix the Makefile to > really clean the tar ball). I'm reluctant to consider that as code > bloat for a full TS parser. > > On the other hand, generated code is bigger (20200 lines). I'm glad > that only the compiler will have to deal with it (laziness again ;-) ) > Another point is that even if i use mpsys, the en50221 parsing code would still be there, which would mean that only a part of the code is eliminated by mpsys's usage not the complete stuff. So it does not make much of a sense, since again unit tests will have to be provided for that part also, and a mix of one code generated library and another part completely hand written one is sure to look damn ugly and really confusing too. That was what i meant by bloat. Just to have a PAT/PMT parser, using a generic library surely is not going to help much.. Manu
