On 02/03/2017 12:36 PM, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 10:57:16AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: >> On Fri, 2017-02-03 at 10:50 -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote: >>> (with JC's other email) >> >> And now with Greg's proper email too >> >>> On 02/03/2017 10:47 AM, Joe Perches wrote: >>>> 64 bit stats isn't implemented, but is that really necessary? >>>> Anything else? >>> >>> Joe, do you have such hardware that you are interested in getting >>> supported, or was that just to reduce the amount of drivers in staging? >>> I am really not clear about what happened to that entire product line, >>> and whether there is any interest in having anything supported these days... >> >> No hardware. Just to reduce staging driver count. > > Without hardware or a "real" maintainer, it shouldn't be moved. > > Heck, if no one has the hardware, let's just delete the thing. I do have one, and other colleagues have some too, but I am not heavily using it, nor do I have many cycles to spend on that... sounds like we could keep it in staging for another 6 months and see what happens then? -- Florian _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
