On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 12:38:45PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote: > On 02/03/2017 12:36 PM, Greg KH wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 10:57:16AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > >> On Fri, 2017-02-03 at 10:50 -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote: > >>> (with JC's other email) > >> > >> And now with Greg's proper email too > >> > >>> On 02/03/2017 10:47 AM, Joe Perches wrote: > >>>> 64 bit stats isn't implemented, but is that really necessary? > >>>> Anything else? > >>> > >>> Joe, do you have such hardware that you are interested in getting > >>> supported, or was that just to reduce the amount of drivers in staging? > >>> I am really not clear about what happened to that entire product line, > >>> and whether there is any interest in having anything supported these days... > >> > >> No hardware. Just to reduce staging driver count. > > > > Without hardware or a "real" maintainer, it shouldn't be moved. > > > > Heck, if no one has the hardware, let's just delete the thing. > > I do have one, and other colleagues have some too, but I am not heavily > using it, nor do I have many cycles to spend on that... sounds like we > could keep it in staging for another 6 months and see what happens then? Well, if it works for you, want to maintain it? :) _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
