Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 05:27:14AM -0800, Michael Zoran wrote: >> On Wed, 2017-01-25 at 16:14 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: >> > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 04:33:46AM -0800, Michael Zoran wrote: >> > > Just for clarity, when you mean staging code? Are you talking about >> > > the >> > > entire vc04_services driver or are we talking about the >> > > vchi_msg_queue >> > > function? >> > > >> > > At this point, vc04_services isn't used by anything in the tree at >> > > all. >> > > So if you want all the unused code deleted, well that sounds to me >> > > like you are talking about the whole driver. >> > >> > Yep. Let's either merge the rest of the code or delete the driver. >> > What we have now doesn't work. >> > >> >> That's Greg and Eric's decision. >> >> The vc04_services was already checked into staging when I was asked to >> submit some ARM64 patches to remove some compiler warnings. My goal has >> always been simply to get ARM64 to work, and I can probably accomplish >> that by submitting changes to the RPI specific tree. >> >> I'm just saying that IF the decision was made to continue upstreaming >> these drivers, then I'm willing to continue helping by submitting >> improvements. > > Either they should be merged, or these apis and structures will be > deleted from the in-kernel code, it can't stay as-is. FWIW, I've just I've started on the camera driver.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
