Re: Greybus Future

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Nov 5, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 12:13:06PM -0700, Joël Porquet wrote:
>> I don't have much hope but would there be a way to find out whether
>> all the code that was developed between the moment we stopped using
>> github and the project was canceled could be pushed back to github?
>>
>> It seems like it would greatly help Greybus have a second life if one
>> has access to the most up-to-date firmware source code to be used as a
>> reference.
>>
>> (Egoistically, it would also help not having this awful impression of
>> wasted time if the work that was achieved during these few months of
>> closed-source development ends up being lost...)
>
> We were able to push out publicly all of the specification changes,
> gbsim, and the kernel changes.  I'll be making a final spec change with
> some legal wording updates that allow everyone to use the spec without
> worrying about any licensing or patent issues next week when I return
> home.

That is so great, thanks a lot for doing it!
Hopefully Greybus will have a second life ;-)

>
> As for the firmware and fdk changes, right now we can't push those
> updates out to the public.  I'm trying hard to get that changed, but I
> can't promise anything :(
Fingers crossed! Please let us know if you need anything on that front.

Cheers,
Jean

>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux