Re: [PATCH 0/7] staging: lustre: last missing patches for lustre 2.6

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2016-08-19 at 14:07 -0400, James Simmons wrote:
> Resolved the last remain bug that prevented earlier submission.
> This covers the remaining patches that were missing from the
> upstream client that was in Lustre 2.6 except for the work for
> LU-2484. The work for LU-2484 depends on the stat infrastructure
> that was removed earlier from the upstream client. That will
> be done at a later date. In reality this is a pre-2.7 client
> due to the landing of many patches earlier from lustre 2.7.
> In any case this is a huge milestone for the lustre client in
> the linux kernel.

Couple things:

1: I'd like to see the lustre #include files separated into
   only two internal/external directories akin to the
   include/linux and include/uapi directories used by linux.

   Is this a reasonable thing?

and

2: James, you seem to aggregate a lot of lustre patches and
   yet you are not a listed maintainer.  Should you be?

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux