Re: [PATCH 0/5] 2nd patch for illegal coding style

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Greg,

I understand what you mention. I will first make it.

The 5 patches among the first series of patch was rejected and the 2nd patch also has a problem. As you said, I will resend them later after

removing build warnings. They will be delivered soon.

Thanks,

Tony.


On 2015년 07월 31일 12:49, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 06:10:09PM +0900, Tony Cho wrote:
This patch V2 includes only patches rejected. The rejected patch for the
following, #ifdef conditionals cover entire functions, introduced new error on
required space before the open parenthesis '('. This is my mistake while
rewriting codes.

The original 13th patch didn't include new fix introduced on the previous patch
due to no sync-up issue. The original 13th patch fixed the same warnings but
in different place.

The 64bit compile warnings will be resolved after sending these patches. Then,
ambiguous sdio/spi parts including preprocessor conditionals will be tried.
Again, please fix the build warnings first, they are much more important
than coding style issues.

thanks,

greg k-h

--
Cho, Tony
Manager, Staff Engineer | Connectivity System Software Team | Atmel Korea (Wireless solutions BU)
#409, Kins Tower, Jeongja-Dong, Bundang-Gu, Seongnam-Si, Gyeonggi-Do, 463-782, Korea
Phone:82 31 784 8400(Ext. 317); Mobile: 82 10 7232 1523
email: tony.cho@xxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux