Re: [PATCH 0/5] 2nd patch for illegal coding style

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 06:10:09PM +0900, Tony Cho wrote:
> This patch V2 includes only patches rejected. The rejected patch for the
> following, #ifdef conditionals cover entire functions, introduced new error on
> required space before the open parenthesis '('. This is my mistake while
> rewriting codes.
> 
> The original 13th patch didn't include new fix introduced on the previous patch
> due to no sync-up issue. The original 13th patch fixed the same warnings but
> in different place. 
> 
> The 64bit compile warnings will be resolved after sending these patches. Then,
> ambiguous sdio/spi parts including preprocessor conditionals will be tried.

Again, please fix the build warnings first, they are much more important
than coding style issues.

thanks,

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux