On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 01:03:49PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > On Wed, 2014-10-15 at 22:53 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 09:11:36AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > > On Wed, 2014-10-15 at 06:03 -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote: > > > [] > > > > I thought I remember Greg saying something about getting rid of this > > > > driver anyway, but I could be wrong. If Greg decides to keep this > > > > driver around, then I think we should something like your suggestion > > > > above. > > > > > > Or maybe just make the Kconfig depend on X86_32 > > > > What I like about your patches is that they are pure theoretical work > > and I don't have to think about them like regular proper patches with a > > signed off by etc. All the fun, none of the responsibility. > > I've sent a lot of signed-off patches. > These are simple suggestions. > > I think COMPILE_TEST isn't useful here. I don't understand... COMPILE_TEST means runing a static checker on the driver. Why would we not want to do QA? regards, dan carpenter _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
