On Wed, 2014-10-15 at 22:53 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 09:11:36AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Wed, 2014-10-15 at 06:03 -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote: > > [] > > > I thought I remember Greg saying something about getting rid of this > > > driver anyway, but I could be wrong. If Greg decides to keep this > > > driver around, then I think we should something like your suggestion > > > above. > > > > Or maybe just make the Kconfig depend on X86_32 > > What I like about your patches is that they are pure theoretical work > and I don't have to think about them like regular proper patches with a > signed off by etc. All the fun, none of the responsibility. I've sent a lot of signed-off patches. These are simple suggestions. I think COMPILE_TEST isn't useful here. I doubt very much beceem has been tested on anything other than an x86_32 board. I once spent a few hours fixing up a bunch of defects in this directory a few years ago. Now I will not submit any more patches for cmhost or anything else in that directory. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
