Re: [PATCH 07/12] drm: drm_display_mode: add signal polarity flags

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Lothar,
> 
> On Monday 17 March 2014 16:14:36 Lothar Waßmann wrote:
> > Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > On Monday 17 March 2014 14:41:09 Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> > > > On 03/13/2014 06:17 PM, Denis Carikli wrote:
> > > > > We need a way to pass signal polarity informations
> > > > > between DRM panels, and the display drivers.
> > > > > 
> > > > > To do that, a pol_flags field was added to drm_display_mode.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Denis Carikli <denis@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > ChangeLog v10->v11:
> > > > > - Since the imx-drm won't be able to retrive its regulators
> > > > > 
> > > > >   from the device tree when using display-timings nodes,
> > > > >   and that I was told that the drm simple-panel driver
> > > > >   already supported that, I then, instead, added what was
> > > > >   lacking to make the eukrea displays work with the
> > > > >   drm-simple-panel driver.
> > > > >   
> > > > >   That required a way to get back the display polarity
> > > > >   informations from the imx-drm driver without affecting
> > > > >   userspace.
> > > > > 
> > > > > ---
> > > > > 
> > > > >  include/drm/drm_crtc.h |    8 ++++++++
> > > > >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> > > > > 
> > > > > diff --git a/include/drm/drm_crtc.h b/include/drm/drm_crtc.h
> > > > > index f764654..61a4fe1 100644
> > > > > --- a/include/drm/drm_crtc.h
> > > > > +++ b/include/drm/drm_crtc.h
> > > > > @@ -131,6 +131,13 @@ enum drm_mode_status {
> > > > > 
> > > > >  #define DRM_MODE_FLAG_3D_MAX	DRM_MODE_FLAG_3D_SIDE_BY_SIDE_HALF
> > > > > 
> > > > > +#define DRM_MODE_FLAG_POL_PIXDATA_NEGEDGE	BIT(1)
> > > > > +#define DRM_MODE_FLAG_POL_PIXDATA_POSEDGE	BIT(2)
> > > > > +#define DRM_MODE_FLAG_POL_PIXDATA_PRESERVE	BIT(3)
> > > > > +#define DRM_MODE_FLAG_POL_DE_NEGEDGE		BIT(4)
> > > > > +#define DRM_MODE_FLAG_POL_DE_POSEDGE		BIT(5)
> > > > > +#define DRM_MODE_FLAG_POL_DE_PRESERVE		BIT(6)
> > > > 
> > > > Could you add some description to these flags.
> > > > What are *_PRESERVE flags for?
> > > > Are those flags 1:1 compatible with respective 'videomode:flags'?
> > > > I guess DE flags should be rather DRM_MODE_FLAG_POL_DE_(LOW|HIGH), am I
> > > > right?
> > > 
> > > Possibly nitpicking, I wouldn't call the clock edge on which data signals
> > > are generated/sampled "data polarity". This is clock polarity
> > > information.
> > > 
> > > Have you seen cases where pixel data and DE are geenrated or need to be
> > > sampled on different edges ?
> > 
> > DE is not a clock signal, but an 'Enable' signal whose value (high or
> > low) defines the window in which the pixel data is valid.
> > The flag defines whether data is valid during the HIGH or LOW period of
> > DE.
> 
> The DRM_MODE_FLAG_POL_DE_(LOW|HIGH) do, by my impression of the proposed new 
> DRM_MODE_FLAG_POL_DE_*EDGE flags is that they define sampling clock edges, not 
> active levels.
> 
The current naming of the flags gives the impression that they describe
the sampling edges of a clock signal. But the DE signal in fact is not
a clock signal but a level sensitive gating signal.


Lothar Waßmann
-- 
___________________________________________________________

Ka-Ro electronics GmbH | Pascalstraße 22 | D - 52076 Aachen
Phone: +49 2408 1402-0 | Fax: +49 2408 1402-10
Geschäftsführer: Matthias Kaussen
Handelsregistereintrag: Amtsgericht Aachen, HRB 4996

www.karo-electronics.de | info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
___________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux