On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 04:00:51AM +0300, Xenia Ragiadakou wrote:
> In the 5/5 patch there are the following changes:
>
> - priv->TxPowerLevelOFDM24G[i] = priv->EEPROMTxPowerLevelOFDM24G[0];
> + priv->TxPowerLevelCCK[i] = priv->EEPROMTxPowerLevelOFDM24G[0] +
> (priv->EEPROMTxPowerLevelCCK - priv->EEPROMTxPowerLevelOFDM24G[1]);
>
>
> - priv->TxPowerLevelOFDM24G[i] = priv->EEPROMTxPowerLevelOFDM24G[1];
> + priv->TxPowerLevelCCK[i] = priv->EEPROMTxPowerLevelCCK;
>
> - priv->TxPowerLevelOFDM24G[i] = priv->EEPROMTxPowerLevelOFDM24G[2];
> + priv->TxPowerLevelCCK[i] = priv->EEPROMTxPowerLevelOFDM24G[2] +
> (priv->EEPROMTxPowerLevelCCK - priv->EEPROMTxPowerLevelOFDM24G[1]);
>
>
> I did not make such a change. I don't know why these diffs appear in
> the patch.
> I hope I am clear now hopefully.
It's not a change. It's just that diffs are sometimes hard to read
and less logical than we expect. For example, one common thing is
the you add a funciton:
+int my_func(void)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
But instead diff will show:
+}
+
+int my_func(void)
+{
+ return 0;
The resulting code is the same.
regards,
dan carpenter
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
