Re: [PATCH 01/23] staging/lustre/clio: don't ignore layout on writeback

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2013-05-31, at 11:29, "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 01:22:51AM +0800, Peng Tao wrote:
From: Niu Yawei <yawei.niu@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:yawei.niu@xxxxxxxxx>>

In some cases such as kernel writeback, we shouldn't ignore the
layout, otherwise, it could race with layout change undergoing.

Intel-bug-id: LU-3160

What can I do with this number?

Already discussed - full URL.

Lustre-commit: 3141db609d95d379761e3b54899618b4037d38f6

Or this one?

This is the Lustre git commit hash, so we can track the commits which have been merged into the kernel tree.

Lustre-change: http://review.whamcloud.com/6154

This one is at least informative, so it can stay, if you really want it
there, but the others are not relevant to anyone outside of your
internal development environment, so do not belong in a Linux kernel
commit message, sorry.

Per Documentation/SubmittingPatches:


"Some people also put extra tags at the end.  They'll just be ignored for
now, but you can do this to mark internal company procedures or just
point out some special detail about the sign-off."

Signed-off-by: Niu Yawei <yawei.niu@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:yawei.niu@xxxxxxxxx>>
Signed-off-by: Jinshan Xiong <jinshan.xiong@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:jinshan.xiong@xxxxxxxxx>>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:andreas.dilger@xxxxxxxxx>>
Reviewed-by: Fan Yong <fan.yong@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:fan.yong@xxxxxxxxx>>
Reviewed-by: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:oleg.drokin@xxxxxxxxx>>

[updated for upstream kernel submission]

What's with the line break and this [] comment?  We don't care about
that.

Also per SubmittingPatches:


"...it is recommended that
you add a line between the last Signed-off-by header and yours, indicating
the nature of your changes. While there is nothing mandatory about this, it
seems like prepending the description with your mail and/or name, all
enclosed in square brackets, is noticeable enough to make it obvious that
you are responsible for last-minute changes."


I guess we can remove the obvious ones (minor or no changes from the original patch), and improve the ones with substantive changes to be more descriptive.


Cheers, Andreas


Signed-off-by: Peng Tao <tao.peng@xxxxxxx<mailto:tao.peng@xxxxxxx>>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:andreas.dilger@xxxxxxxxx>>

It should be a unbroken series of lines here.

Care to fix this all up and resend?

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux