On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 09:19:19AM +0000, Martyn Welch wrote: > On 30/11/11 11:00, Greg KH wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 05:25:39AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > >> On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 02:23:31PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > >>> What I mean is who else can we ask to review this? Probably it would > >>> be the PCI people. > >>> > >>> PCI SUBSYSTEM > >>> M: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>> L: linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>> > >>> That's the only obvious one that I know of, but there might be other > >>> people interested as well if we can think of them. Andrew Morton was > >>> complaining about stuff coming out of staging without him being aware > >>> but he reads lkml so I think CC'ing lkml is enough for him. > >> > >> Yes, when we submit the patches to move things, copying lkml will be a > >> good idea. > >> > >> After the 3.2 merge window closes, next week, I'll take a look at the > >> code and let you know what I think needs to be done to get this out of > >> staging. > > > > Ok, I didn't get past vme.h, please remove all the typedefs and the > > foolish _t stuff, and we can then retry this :) > > > > I assume that the correct thing to do (given that all those typedefs currently > map to u32s) is to just use u32s? Yes. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
