Re: VME and the staging tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 05:25:39AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 02:23:31PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > What I mean is who else can we ask to review this?  Probably it would
> > be the PCI people.
> > 
> > PCI SUBSYSTEM
> > M:      Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > L:      linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > 
> > That's the only obvious one that I know of, but there might be other
> > people interested as well if we can think of them.  Andrew Morton was
> > complaining about stuff coming out of staging without him being aware
> > but he reads lkml so I think CC'ing lkml is enough for him.
> 
> Yes, when we submit the patches to move things, copying lkml will be a
> good idea.
> 
> After the 3.2 merge window closes, next week, I'll take a look at the
> code and let you know what I think needs to be done to get this out of
> staging.

Ok, I didn't get past vme.h, please remove all the typedefs and the
foolish _t stuff, and we can then retry this :)

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux