On 06/09/11 15:29, anish singh wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:jic23@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > On 06/09/11 09:48, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > On 06/09/11 09:34, anish singh wrote: > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <mailto:khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx>>> wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 13:53:09 +0530, anish singh wrote: > >> > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 10:41 AM, anish singh <anish198519851985@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:anish198519851985@xxxxxxxxx> <mailto:anish198519851985@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:anish198519851985@xxxxxxxxx>>>wrote: > >> > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <mailto:khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx>>> wrote: > >> > >> To be clearer, it is down to the i2c BUS (adapter) driver, NOT the i2c > >> > >> device driver. So the patch is correct. > >> > >> > >> > > I think i can take Jean ack on this?If yes then Joanthan kindly apply > >> > > this patch and i think you didn't lead me in wrong way as whatever > >> > > said by you is corroborated by jean also i.e. it is I2C bus driver > >> > > responsiblity > >> > > to care about DMA. > >> > > > >> > Sorry to ping you again.Can i take your ack on this? > >> > >> Yes of course. > >> > >> Acked-by: Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <mailto:khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx>>> > >> > >> Thanks a ton.Jonathan kindly apply it now :) > > Greg, I'll send this one on to you with the set I currently have out for review. > > > Doh, after all this, I just tried to apply this to find the code in question has already > gone. Anish, what tree are you working against? > > I am using linux-next.Is it not the right tree for staging? Something curious is going on then because this code is no longer in linux-next either. > > Looks like I did an equivalent clean up > (with a load of others) back in May then forgot about it. > > Sorry all. I should have actually have checked it was still relevant rather than reviewing > purely on basis of content of patch... > > Jonathan > > _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
