On 06/09/11 09:48, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On 06/09/11 09:34, anish singh wrote: >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >> >> On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 13:53:09 +0530, anish singh wrote: >> > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 10:41 AM, anish singh <anish198519851985@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:anish198519851985@xxxxxxxxx>>wrote: >> > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >> > >> To be clearer, it is down to the i2c BUS (adapter) driver, NOT the i2c >> > >> device driver. So the patch is correct. >> > >> >> > > I think i can take Jean ack on this?If yes then Joanthan kindly apply >> > > this patch and i think you didn't lead me in wrong way as whatever >> > > said by you is corroborated by jean also i.e. it is I2C bus driver >> > > responsiblity >> > > to care about DMA. >> > > >> > Sorry to ping you again.Can i take your ack on this? >> >> Yes of course. >> >> Acked-by: Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx>> >> >> Thanks a ton.Jonathan kindly apply it now :) > Greg, I'll send this one on to you with the set I currently have out for review. > Doh, after all this, I just tried to apply this to find the code in question has already gone. Anish, what tree are you working against? Looks like I did an equivalent clean up (with a load of others) back in May then forgot about it. Sorry all. I should have actually have checked it was still relevant rather than reviewing purely on basis of content of patch... Jonathan _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
