On 06/09/11 09:34, anish singh wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 13:53:09 +0530, anish singh wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 10:41 AM, anish singh <anish198519851985@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:anish198519851985@xxxxxxxxx>>wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > >> To be clearer, it is down to the i2c BUS (adapter) driver, NOT the i2c > > >> device driver. So the patch is correct. > > >> > > > I think i can take Jean ack on this?If yes then Joanthan kindly apply > > > this patch and i think you didn't lead me in wrong way as whatever > > > said by you is corroborated by jean also i.e. it is I2C bus driver > > > responsiblity > > > to care about DMA. > > > > > Sorry to ping you again.Can i take your ack on this? > > Yes of course. > > Acked-by: Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx>> > > Thanks a ton.Jonathan kindly apply it now :) Greg, I'll send this one on to you with the set I currently have out for review. Jonathan _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
