Re: [PATCH 0/7] Some atomisp fixes and improvements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 05:52:16PM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Fri, 26 Jun 2020 18:00:21 +0300
> Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> escreveu:
> 
> > On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 04:04:52PM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > > Those patches are meant to improve device detection by the atomisp driver,
> > > relying on ACPI bios when possible.
> > > 
> > > It also adds a basis for using ACPI PM, but only if the DSDT tables have
> > > a description about how to turn on the resources needed by the cameras.
> > > 
> > > At least on the device I'm using for tests, this is not the case.  
> > 
> > Is this in your experimental tree? 
> 
> Yes. 
> 
> > I'll rebase mine on top and test.
> > After I will send the rest from my series and give a tag to this.
> 
> It would be helpful if you could test removing the DMI match table from
> your board. If your device has a DSDT table close to the one I have, the
> new code may be able to get everything from DSDT.

I have checked the atomisp_v5 branch and it doesn't bring any regression to my
case. So, feel free to add
Tested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

I'll send rebased patches soon.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko


_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux