Em Fri, 26 Jun 2020 17:52:16 +0200 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@xxxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > Em Fri, 26 Jun 2020 18:00:21 +0300 > Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 04:04:52PM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > > Those patches are meant to improve device detection by the atomisp driver, > > > relying on ACPI bios when possible. > > > > > > It also adds a basis for using ACPI PM, but only if the DSDT tables have > > > a description about how to turn on the resources needed by the cameras. > > > > > > At least on the device I'm using for tests, this is not the case. > > > > Is this in your experimental tree? > > Yes. > > > I'll rebase mine on top and test. > > After I will send the rest from my series and give a tag to this. > > It would be helpful if you could test removing the DMI match table from > your board. If your device has a DSDT table close to the one I have, the > new code may be able to get everything from DSDT. Err... I spoke too soon... looking on the logs from your 00/15, it seems that your device's DSDT is indeed different: [ 116.401267] ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM (0x1001) If possible, could you please send me (could be in priv) a copy of your DSDT? Thanks, Mauro _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
