Em Fri, 26 Jun 2020 18:00:21 +0300 Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 04:04:52PM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > Those patches are meant to improve device detection by the atomisp driver, > > relying on ACPI bios when possible. > > > > It also adds a basis for using ACPI PM, but only if the DSDT tables have > > a description about how to turn on the resources needed by the cameras. > > > > At least on the device I'm using for tests, this is not the case. > > Is this in your experimental tree? Yes. > I'll rebase mine on top and test. > After I will send the rest from my series and give a tag to this. It would be helpful if you could test removing the DMI match table from your board. If your device has a DSDT table close to the one I have, the new code may be able to get everything from DSDT. > > > > > Mauro Carvalho Chehab (7): > > media: atomisp: reorganize the code under gmin_subdev_add() > > media: atomisp: Prepare sensor support for ACPI PM > > media: atomisp: properly parse CLK PMIC on newer devices > > media: atomisp: fix call to g_frame_interval > > media: atomisp: print info if gpio0 and gpio2 were detected > > media: atomisp: split add from find subdev > > media: atomisp: place all gpio parsing together > > > > .../staging/media/atomisp/pci/atomisp_cmd.c | 2 +- > > .../media/atomisp/pci/atomisp_gmin_platform.c | 393 ++++++++++++------ > > 2 files changed, 267 insertions(+), 128 deletions(-) > > > > -- > > 2.26.2 > > > > > Thanks, Mauro _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
