Hi Jas, Am 10.04.19 um 15:45 schrieb Jas: > On 5/04/19 3:12 PM, Stefan Wahren wrote: >> Hi Jasminko, >> >> maybe this sounds overcautious to you, but did you test your patch on a >> Raspberry Pi? >> > > Hello, > > I've tested it on a Raspberry Pi 3 b, with a 32 bit linux-next kernel, > and with an aarch64 rpi-5.0.y kernel, without any issues. great > > I was not able to boot any arch64 linux-next kernel on the Raspberry > Pi, and I'm not sure why. I tried mainline u-boot and without u-boot. > If anyone has any tips for how to do that, I can test the patch with > an aarch64 linux-next kernel too. Hm, kernelci.org looks okay so there shouldn't be a regression. Maybe this [1] is helpful, but it doesn't explain everything. Nevertheless, i'm fine with this change: Acked-by: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@xxxxxxxx> Thanks Stefan [1] - https://gist.github.com/lategoodbye/c7317a42bf7f9c07f5a91baed8c68f75 _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
