On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 12:43:34AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 10:11:03PM +0100, Arend van Spriel wrote: > > On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 20:45:12 +0100, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > >On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 12:16:26AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > >>On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 02:39:14PM +0100, Arend van Spriel wrote: > > >>> The implementation for bss_info_changed was not handling all > > >>> changes as provided by mac80211 module. These have been added > > >>> where needed. > > >>> > > >> > > >>The subject says clean up and the long description say implementing > > >>new features were implemented on an as needed basis. > > >> > > > > Your remark applies to the cover letter describing the patch series. > > Each individual patch in this series is targetting a separate issue > > imho. > > > > No, I mean this patch specifically. Git history doesn't care about > patch sets, only about individual patches. (The cover letter is not > saved anywhere). I've commented on the patch below which I things I > view as behavior changes and which I view as cleanup. Arend, I agree with Dan here, please rework the patch series you just resent to not do stuff like this. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
