On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 01:12:48AM +0200, Tomas Winkler wrote: > + > + return 0xFF & rc; You didn't introduce this, but it's wrong. It's masking out negative error codes. The caller does check for error codes. Probably it would make more sense to just return rc directly... I'm not sure what was intended here. regards, dan carpenter _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
