Hi Sakari,
On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 06:36:59PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Hi Rui,
>
> On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 02:20:02PM +0100, Rui Miguel Silva wrote:
> > Hi Sakari,
> > On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 02:15:53PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > > From: Rui Miguel Silva <rmfrfs@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > We are allocating memory for the v4l2 flash configuration structure and
> > > leak it in the normal path. Just use the stack for this as we do not
> > > use it outside of this function.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 2870b52bae4c ("greybus: lights: add lights implementation")
> > > Reported-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Rui Miguel Silva <rmfrfs@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> >
> > This patch is *not* the patch that I have send, here are the code
> > differences from my patch to the one in this series:
> >
> > < struct led_classdev_flash *iled = NULL;
> > ---
> > > struct led_classdev *iled = NULL;
> > 51c57
> > < iled = &channel_ind->fled;
> > ---
> > > iled = &channel_ind->fled.led_cdev;
> > 89c95
> >
> > So, this do not apply at all.
> > Maybe you change something in your side.
>
> It's been rebased on linux-next and in particular, patch 85f7ff9702bc
> ("media: v4l2-flash: Use led_classdev instead of led_classdev_flash for
> indicator").
Yeah, I miss that patch also that touch greybus, thanks for the
rebase.
---
Cheers,
Rui
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
