Hi Rui,
On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 02:20:02PM +0100, Rui Miguel Silva wrote:
> Hi Sakari,
> On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 02:15:53PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > From: Rui Miguel Silva <rmfrfs@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > We are allocating memory for the v4l2 flash configuration structure and
> > leak it in the normal path. Just use the stack for this as we do not
> > use it outside of this function.
> >
> > Fixes: 2870b52bae4c ("greybus: lights: add lights implementation")
> > Reported-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Rui Miguel Silva <rmfrfs@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
>
> This patch is *not* the patch that I have send, here are the code
> differences from my patch to the one in this series:
>
> < struct led_classdev_flash *iled = NULL;
> ---
> > struct led_classdev *iled = NULL;
> 51c57
> < iled = &channel_ind->fled;
> ---
> > iled = &channel_ind->fled.led_cdev;
> 89c95
>
> So, this do not apply at all.
> Maybe you change something in your side.
It's been rebased on linux-next and in particular, patch 85f7ff9702bc
("media: v4l2-flash: Use led_classdev instead of led_classdev_flash for
indicator").
--
Sakari Ailus
e-mail: sakari.ailus@xxxxxx XMPP: sailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
