Hi! > >>>Steve, > >>> > >>>You need to remove the fim node now that you've moved this to V4L2 controls. > >>> > >> > >>Yep, I caught this just after sending the v8 patchset. I'll send > >>a v9 of this patch. > > > >This needs ack from devicetree people, then it can be merged. Can you > >be a bit more forceful getting the ack? > > OK, I need an Ack please, he said, in a forceful way. :) I'd tune the force up a tiny bit more. This is not FreeBSD ;-). You can read some emails from Linus for inspiration. Or drink few beers and look at Al Viro's emails. > In fact Ack's are needed for all the changes to dts sources, > patches 4-14. Actually, are they? Those should not need acks from device tree people, just acks from ARM people, and those are easier to get... in fact they should not need any acks, you should just send them to arm people and get them merged. 1-4 is just a documentation, and you have acks there. (Except 2?) That's ready to be merged, probably via the media tree? Just make it clear you want it merged. 15,16 should be ready to. Media tree, too, I guess. drivers/staging is greg. Advantage is these do _not_ need to go after the dts changes. It is a driver. Actually I'd normally add dts support after the driver. So you can push it now. > >I don't think it makes sense to resubmit v9 before that. This is not a > >rocket science. > > I guess that makes sense, I'll wait for Ack's from all these patches > before submitting the entire patchset as v9. You may want to split the series, according to mainainters, or just ask the maintainers to merge the relevant parts. I believe most of it can be pushed now. Good luck, Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
