On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 11:07:53PM +0100, RafaÅ MiÅecki wrote: > 2010/12/8 Henry Ptasinski <henryp@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > Second attempt at cleaning up firmware filenames. > > > > The basename-apiversion-codeversion construction for firmware filenames is not > > used by most other firmware files, adds complexity, and is not providing any > > value. ÂRenamed the firmware files using just basename-apiversion. ÂAlso, fixed > > WHENCE to have correct path to brcmfmac files. > > > > Signed-off-by: Henry Ptasinski <henryp@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Henry, I believe we got report that Red Hat can not include your > firmware anyway because of licensing. Can you change license to some > common one which allows providing your firmware with distributions? That's news to me, what specific licensing issue have you heard about here? Last I saw, the issues were resolved and everyone could redistribute this firmware. Do you have a bugzilla number? thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
