On 6/8/21 10:48 AM, Hu Haowen wrote:
>
> 在 2021/6/8 上午9:41, teng sterling 写道:
>> Hu Haowen <src.res@xxxxxxxx> 于2021年6月7日周一 下午9:52写道：
>>>
>>> 在 2021/6/7 下午9:40, teng sterling 写道:
>>>> CC siyanteng@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> Hu Haowen <src.res@xxxxxxxx> 于2021年6月7日周一 下午5:37写道：
>>>>> The original file has added a former intro in commit b51208d41c6a4e7fc2f0
>>>>> ("docs: Tweak the top-level Sphinx page") and hence update the Chinese
>>>>> version for it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Hu Haowen <src.res@xxxxxxxx>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Documentation/translations/zh_CN/index.rst | 5 +++++
>>>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/translations/zh_CN/index.rst b/Documentation/translations/zh_CN/index.rst
>>>>> index 1f953d3439a5..003126abc0d6 100644
>>>>> --- a/Documentation/translations/zh_CN/index.rst
>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/translations/zh_CN/index.rst
>>>>> @@ -17,6 +17,11 @@
>>>>> **翻译计划:*kernel's documentation*
>>>>> 内核中文文档欢迎任何翻译投稿，特别是关于内核用户和管理员指南部分。
>>>>>
>>>>> +这是内核文档树的顶级目录。内核文档，就像内核本身一样，在很大程度上是一项正
>>>> how about:
>>>>
>>>> 这是中文内核文档树的顶级目录。
>>>
>>> But the English version says "kernel's documentation". It seems that we
>>> should add an explanation for readers in order to drag them out of the
>>> dilemma on whether he or she should update En version at first, as your
>>> thought picking ideas from "disclaimer-zh_CN".
>>>
>>> What's your opinion, maintainers?
>> When the original documentation is updated, the Chinese documentation
>> has to follow. I think we have reached a consensus on this point.
>> However, this file is described in this directory as zh_CN, so I think
>> it needs to be localized. But the localization will conflict with
>> "disclaimer-zh_CN".
>
>
> Hmm... That's an issue. Does that mean we should edit "disclaimer-zh_CN"
> as well to avoid the conflict?
>
the disclaimer is for single docs, shorter is better. For this file, we don't
have to copy exactly from original index.rst.
Thanks
Alex
