Hu Haowen <src.res@xxxxxxxx> 于2021年6月7日周一 下午9:52写道：
>
>
> 在 2021/6/7 下午9:40, teng sterling 写道:
> > CC siyanteng@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > Hu Haowen <src.res@xxxxxxxx> 于2021年6月7日周一 下午5:37写道：
> >> The original file has added a former intro in commit b51208d41c6a4e7fc2f0
> >> ("docs: Tweak the top-level Sphinx page") and hence update the Chinese
> >> version for it.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Hu Haowen <src.res@xxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> Documentation/translations/zh_CN/index.rst | 5 +++++
> >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/translations/zh_CN/index.rst b/Documentation/translations/zh_CN/index.rst
> >> index 1f953d3439a5..003126abc0d6 100644
> >> --- a/Documentation/translations/zh_CN/index.rst
> >> +++ b/Documentation/translations/zh_CN/index.rst
> >> @@ -17,6 +17,11 @@
> >> **翻译计划:*kernel's documentation*
> >> 内核中文文档欢迎任何翻译投稿，特别是关于内核用户和管理员指南部分。
> >>
> >> +这是内核文档树的顶级目录。内核文档，就像内核本身一样，在很大程度上是一项正
> > how about:
> >
> > 这是中文内核文档树的顶级目录。
>
>
> But the English version says "kernel's documentation". It seems that we
> should add an explanation for readers in order to drag them out of the
> dilemma on whether he or she should update En version at first, as your
> thought picking ideas from "disclaimer-zh_CN".
>
> What's your opinion, maintainers?
When the original documentation is updated, the Chinese documentation
has to follow. I think we have reached a consensus on this point.
However, this file is described in this directory as zh_CN, so I think
it needs to be localized. But the localization will conflict with
"disclaimer-zh_CN".
Thanks,
Yanteng
>
>
> >> +在进行的工作；当我们努力将许多分散的文件整合成一个连贯的整体时尤其如此。另
> >> +外，随时欢迎您对内核文档进行改进；如果您想提供帮助，请加入vger.kernel.org
> > 中文内核文档进行改进；
> >> +上的linux-doc邮件列表。
> > 上的linux-doc邮件列表，先改进原始英文文档，再将其翻译为中文后，更新相应的中文文档。
> >> +
> >> 许可证文档
> >> ----------
> >>
> >> --
> >> 2.25.1
> >>
> > BTW, I think these are similar to "disclaimer-zh_CN", but not as good
> > as the latter.
> >
> > Alex and Xiangcheng, what do you think?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Yanteng
>
