On Thu, 5 Mar 2020 21:10:21 +0100 Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@xxxxxx> wrote: > >> I suggest to take another look at review comments for previous patch versions. > > > > I have, and I believe Masami has satisfactory addressed them, > > I agree to parts of the shown software evolution. > > > > if they needed addressing. > > Remaining issues will eventually be clarified under other circumstances. > > > >> Do you identify any feedback as a bug report (or clarification request) here? > > > > I still don't have the foggiest clue what you are talking about. > > It seems that a few reminders can help here. > > > > What bug are you reporting? > > Examples: > > * Another typo > “… contain only alphabets, …” > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/967d6fee-e0cd-c53f-c1f6-b367a979762c@xxxxxx/ > https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/5/247 Legitimate but not critical. > > * Use case explanation > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/f3c51b0a-2a55-6523-96e2-4f9ef0635d9f@xxxxxx/ > https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/5/429 I believe what Masami has is sufficient. > > * Challenges for the safe application of key hierarchies > “kernel.ftrace”? > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/c4a0bc10-a38b-6ea9-e125-7a37f667e61a@xxxxxx/ > https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/28/363 Again, what Masami has is sufficient. > > * Feature request for syntax description > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/2390b729-1b0b-26b5-66bc-92e40e3467b1@xxxxxx/ > https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/27/1869 > Masami's reply to you was sufficient. Of your examples, only one do I see can be applied, but is just a minor change in wording. I don't know where you are going with this, and unless you plan on submitting patches, I think this document is complete as is. -- Steve
