On 3/5/20 9:30 AM, Markus Elfring wrote: >>> How does this feedback fit to known concerns around the discussed wordings? >> >> As far as I am concerned, it means that the documentation is >> sufficiently good enough to be useful and not difficult to read. > > Would you like to add anything to my previous review comments > (besides simple typo adjustments)? If you would (could) be more concrete (or discrete) in your suggestions, I would be glad to comment on them. > > >> It does not mean that it's perfect. Patches can still be made to it. > > I hope that corresponding agreements will be achieved for > further improvements. -- ~Randy
