>> How does this feedback fit to known concerns around the discussed wordings? > > As far as I am concerned, it means that the documentation is > sufficiently good enough to be useful and not difficult to read. Would you like to add anything to my previous review comments (besides simple typo adjustments)? > It does not mean that it's perfect. Patches can still be made to it. I hope that corresponding agreements will be achieved for further improvements. Regards, Markus
