On 3/5/20 11:06 AM, Markus Elfring wrote: >>>>> Which of the possibly unanswered issues do you find not concrete enough so far? >>>> >>>> e.g.: >>>>>>> Will the clarification become more constructive for remaining challenges? >>> >>> Do you expect that known open issues need to be repeated for each patch revision? >> >> Ideally not, but not very much is ideal. > > Did you notice any aspects where I would be still looking for more helpful answers? Sorry, I haven't been tracking all of the email Q&A/response/replies all that carefully. > >> IOW, it is sometimes required (if one cares enough; sometimes >> one just gives up). > > I find this communication detail unfortunate occasionally. Sure. I do too. > >>> How do you think about the desired tracking of bug reports >>> also for this software? > … >> Masami seems to be responsive. > > The involved contributors show different response delays, don't they? That's always the case, in any of the Linux subsystems that I have been involved with. -- ~Randy
