RE: [PATCH net-next v2 1/8] net: phylink: propagate resolved link config via mac_link_up()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/8] net: phylink: propagate resolved link config
> via mac_link_up()
> 
> On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 at 20:21, Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 at 15:36, Russell King - ARM Linux admin
> > <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > dpaa2 is complicated by the firmware, and that we can't switch the
> > > interface mode between (SGMII,1000base-X) and 10G.
> > >
> > > If the firmware is in "DPMAC_LINK_TYPE_PHY" mode, it expects to be
> > > told the current link parameters via the dpmac_set_link_state() call
> > > - it isn't clear whether that needs to be called for other modes
> > > with the up/down state (firmware API documentation is poor.)
> > >
> >
> > With PCS control in Linux, I am pretty sure that you don't want
> > anything other than DPMAC_LINK_TYPE_PHY anyway.
> > Basically in DPMAC_LINK_TYPE_FIXED, the MC firmware is in control of
> > the PCS and polls its link state to emit link notifications to objects
> > connected to the DPMAC. So Linux control of PCS would class with
> 
> s/class/clash/
> 
> > firmware control of the PCS, leading to undesirable side-effects to
> > say the least.


If the DPMAC object is in DPMAC_LINK_TYPE_FIXED, the dpaa2-eth in fact
does not even connect to a phy so all the phylink interaction is not happening.
As Vladimir said, in this case it's the MC firmware's job to poll the PCS and
notify any connected objects of a link change.

> >
> > Regards,
> > -Vladimir




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux