Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/8] net: phylink: propagate resolved link config via mac_link_up()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 08:22:39PM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 at 20:21, Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 at 15:36, Russell King - ARM Linux admin
> > <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > dpaa2 is complicated by the firmware, and that we can't switch the
> > > interface mode between (SGMII,1000base-X) and 10G.
> > >
> > > If the firmware is in "DPMAC_LINK_TYPE_PHY" mode, it expects to be told
> > > the current link parameters via the dpmac_set_link_state() call - it
> > > isn't clear whether that needs to be called for other modes with the
> > > up/down state (firmware API documentation is poor.)
> > >
> >
> > With PCS control in Linux, I am pretty sure that you don't want
> > anything other than DPMAC_LINK_TYPE_PHY anyway.
> > Basically in DPMAC_LINK_TYPE_FIXED, the MC firmware is in control of
> > the PCS and polls its link state to emit link notifications to objects
> > connected to the DPMAC. So Linux control of PCS would class with
> 
> s/class/clash/
> 
> > firmware control of the PCS, leading to undesirable side-effects to
> > say the least.

Yes, which is why we only register the PCS with phylink if we're in
DPMAC_LINK_TYPE_PHY mode.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux