On 2019-03-07 05:03, Alex Shi wrote:
On 2019/3/6 11:17 下午, Federico Vaga wrote:
As I wrote in the commit message, this is just a example to show
the
structure and share the main message.
What I wrote is just a 10 minutes sketch, to share an idea. This is
**not**
the text that I'm proposing; what I'm proposing here are the
structure and the
concepts/ideas/messages. The final patch will be written
appropriately, but
before doing it I would like to collect the messages that we want to
put in
it; I listed above what I think is necessary to say.
Got it. yes, it's a good idea, and we'd better figure out the more
elegant, precise and legally words. :)
I wouldn't go that far with the legal jargon. There is nothing legal
about
this, only that who read a translation must be aware of its limitations.
+
+Translations
+------------
+
.. toctree::
:maxdepth: 1
diff --git a/Documentation/translations/it_IT/disclaimer-ita.rst
b/Documentation/translations/it_IT/disclaimer-ita.rst index
d68e52de6a5d..aacc1a0346db 100644
--- a/Documentation/translations/it_IT/disclaimer-ita.rst
+++ b/Documentation/translations/it_IT/disclaimer-ita.rst
@@ -1,13 +1,6 @@
:orphan:
why the orphan here? does that mean no maintainer for it_IT
currently?
It is a Sphinx tag to avoid warnings at build time. Instead of
re-writing
exactly the same text in all files, this one is included at the top of
all
translated documents. But, since it is not a real document this is not
included in any TOC and sphinx complains; that's why we need the
orphan tag
http://www.sphinx-doc.org/en/master/usage/restructuredtext/field-lists.html#metadata
Thanks a lot for the explanations! :)
--
Federico Vaga
http://www.federicovaga.it/
