Re: [PATCH v2 00/16] nvmem: rework of the subsystem for non-DT users

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 10/09/18 09:24, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
The API changes change so many things, that these series would be
incompatible. I can send the series separately but they would be
co-dependent anyway. Does it sound good?

What am asking is to reorder the patches in a such a way that its easy to review.
ex: Order can be :
1> kref and update nvmem_unregister followed by the provider changes.
2> Add support to cell tables, cell lookup, notifier
3> general cleanup patches  followed by fixes

Current set seems to jump from one thing to other which makes it hard to follow and time consuming while review!


--srini


Bart



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux