2018-09-10 11:50 GMT+02:00 Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@xxxxxxxxxx>: > > > On 10/09/18 10:45, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: >>> >>> Yes, this is how it should be! >>> >> Any actual reason for not putting these definitions into a separate >> 'machine' header? This approach is currently used by gpio, pinctrl, >> iio and regulator framework because most systems use either DT or ACPI >> and don't need to pull in any stuff aimed at board files. > > > I don't want to create header files specific to usecase! > Lets keep it simple! > I won't argue this point anymore, but I disagree. This is not specific to a usecase but to a whole family of users that need to a) define nvmem cells without knowing the provider and b) associate them with consumers. Something normal providers and consumers are not bothered by, thus a new header file would be in order. But as you wish... Bart
