2018-09-10 12:02 GMT+02:00 Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@xxxxxxxxxx>: > > > On 10/09/18 09:24, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: >> >> The API changes change so many things, that these series would be >> incompatible. I can send the series separately but they would be >> co-dependent anyway. Does it sound good? > > > What am asking is to reorder the patches in a such a way that its easy to > review. > ex: Order can be : > 1> kref and update nvmem_unregister followed by the provider changes. > 2> Add support to cell tables, cell lookup, notifier > 3> general cleanup patches followed by fixes > > Current set seems to jump from one thing to other which makes it hard to > follow and time consuming while review! > I would just change that ordering a bit: I think we should fix stuff that's broken first, so fix the name field of struct nvmem_device, then the rest as you listed it. Bart
